Back to case studies
Instrumental Hip-HopFormat StudyArtistsMonthly

How an Instrumental Producer Grew a 200-Track Catalogue to 180k Monthly Listeners

200-track catalogue averaged 900 streams/track/month

The question

A Los Angeles-based instrumental hip-hop producer had been releasing beats and instrumentals for 5 years, accumulating a 200-track catalogue. His total monthly listeners were 21,000. He couldn't promote 200 tracks individually — the economics didn't work. The question: what is the right promotional strategy for a large catalogue where individual track economics are too thin to justify per-track campaigns?

What was tried before

What Didn't Work

  • Promoted individual tracks sporadically when budget allowed — no cumulative effect
  • Created 'beat tapes' compiling tracks — performed better than individual tracks but still limited
  • Submitted to lo-fi and study playlists — some placements but listener conversion to the full catalogue was low

Strategy applied

What We Did

  1. 1Identified the 5 tracks with the highest existing save rates — these were the 'gateway tracks' for the catalogue
  2. 2Ran monthly Chartlex campaigns cycling through the 5 gateway tracks in rotation — never promoting a cold track
  3. 3Used Spotify for Artists 'Artist Pick' to rotate different catalogue sections monthly — invited existing listeners to explore
  4. 4Set up an 'Instrumental Playlist' of his own tracks on his profile — tracks arranged to maximise completion and next-track play
  5. 5Monitored which campaign tracks drove the highest 'Other songs by this artist' streams — a proxy for catalogue engagement

Observed results

The Outcome

Monthly listeners grew from 21k to 180k in 11 months. Average streams per track in catalogue grew from 180 to 900 per month.

  • Monthly listeners: 21,000 → 180,000 in 11 months
  • Average monthly streams per catalogue track: 180 → 900 (+400%)
  • Top 5 gateway tracks each exceeded 50,000 total streams
  • Spotify began recommending his profile to listeners who completed other instrumental hip-hop tracks
  • Income: monthly streaming royalties grew from ~$840 to ~$7,200/month

Why it worked

The Takeaway

A large catalogue creates natural compounding if you can seed the right entry points. Listeners who discover one strong track and add it to a playlist tend to explore adjacent catalogue. By identifying the 5 tracks with existing proof of listener affinity (high save rates), the campaign avoided wasting budget on cold tracks. The rotating Artist Pick strategy was crucial: existing listeners discovered catalogue depth they hadn't known about, creating streams from zero marginal campaign spend. The owned playlist also gave the algorithm a structured path to follow when recommending subsequent tracks.

Who this applies to

Is This You?

Producers and beatmakers with large cataloguesArtists who release frequently and have extensive back cataloguesAnyone trying to optimise ROI across many tracks rather than betting everything on individual releases

Your turn

Want results like this?

Browse our plans and start your Spotify campaign today.

See all plans →